Capitalists contra workers
from Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan
Over the past 139 years, the total return on U.S. equities (capital appreciation plus reinvested dividends) grew 905 times faster than the manufacturing wage rate.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
RWER 26,369 subscribers
Regular Contributors
follow this blog on Twitter
Top Posts- last 48 hours
- Cherry-picking economic models
- Austerity-obsessed Europe could combat climate change without raising taxes
- Growth and Growth
- Why monetary policies are impotent
- The slogan should be, “Save Sapiens.”
- Modern macroeconomics
- Brazil, the Amazon, and Global Warming: It ain't quite what the media tell you
- What makes economics a science?
- “Capitalism was built on the exploitation and suffering of black slaves and continues to thrive on the exploitation of the poor”
- Key member of Swedish Academy of Sciences calls for immediate suspension of the “Nobel Prize for Economics”
Real World Economics Review
The RWER is a free open-access journal, but with access to the current issue restricted to its 25,952 subscribers (07/12/16). Subscriptions are free. Over one million full-text copies of RWER papers are downloaded per year.
Comments on recent RWER issues
————– WEA Paperbacks ————– ———– available at low prices ———– ————- on most Amazons ————-
WEA Periodicals
----- World Economics Association ----- founded 2011 – today 13,800 members
Recent Comments
- Craig on Cherry-picking economic models
- Frank Salter on Austerity-obsessed Europe could combat climate change without raising taxes
- Yoshinori Shiozawa on Cherry-picking economic models
- Frank Salter on Austerity-obsessed Europe could combat climate change without raising taxes
- davetaylor1 on Cherry-picking economic models
- davetaylor1 on Cherry-picking economic models
- Charlie Thomas on Growth and Growth
- Ken Zimmerman on Austerity-obsessed Europe could combat climate change without raising taxes
- John Doyle on Cherry-picking economic models
- davetaylor1 on Cherry-picking economic models
- Frank Salter on Austerity-obsessed Europe could combat climate change without raising taxes
- davetaylor1 on Cherry-picking economic models
- Yoshinori Shiozawa on Cherry-picking economic models
- Robert Locke on Cherry-picking economic models
- Robert Locke on Cherry-picking economic models
Comments on issue 74 - repaired
Comments on RWER issues
WEA Online Conferences
—- Forthcoming WEA Paperbacks —-
———— Armando Ochangco ———-
Shimshon Bichler / Jonathan Nitzan
————— Herman Daly —————-
————— Asad Zaman —————
—————– C. T. Kurien —————
————— Robert Locke —————-
Guidelines for Comments
• This blog is renowned for its high level of comment discussion. These guidelines exist to further that reputation.
• Engage with the arguments of the post and of your fellow discussants.
• Try not to flood discussion threads with only your comments.
• Do not post slight variations of the same comment under multiple posts.
• Show your fellow discussants the same courtesy you would if you were sitting around a table with them.
Most downloaded RWER papers
- Green capitalism: the god that failed (Richard Smith)
- What Is Neoclassical Economics? (Christian Arnsperger and Yanis Varoufakis)
- Debunking the theory of the firm—a chronology (Steve Keen and Russell Standish)
- The state of China’s economy 2009 (James Angresano)
- The housing bubble and the financial crisis (Dean Baker)
- Why some countries are poor and some rich: a non-Eurocentric view (Deniz Kellecioglu)
- New thinking on poverty (Paul Shaffer)
- Global finance in crisis (Jacques Sapir)
- Trade and inequality: The role of economists (Dean Baker)
Family Links
- C. P. Chandrasekhar’s Blog
- David Ruccio’s Blog
- Dean Baker – Beat the Press
- Jayati Ghosh’s Blog
- Lars Syll's Blog
- Mark Weisbrot
- Norbert Haering' Blog
- real-world economics review
- Steve Keen’s Debtwatch
- The Progressive Economics Forum
- The Radford Free Press
- Thomas Palley
- WEA Pedagogy Bog
- WEA Young Economists Network
Contact
follow this blog on Twitter
RWER Board of Editors
Nicola Acocella (Italy, University of Rome) Robert Costanza (USA, Portland State University) Wolfgang Drechsler ( Estonia, Tallinn University of Technology) Kevin Gallagher (USA, Boston University) Jo Marie Griesgraber (USA, New Rules for Global Finance Coalition) Bernard Guerrien (France, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne) Michael Hudson (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Frederic S. Lee (USA, University of Missouri at Kansas City) Anne Mayhew (USA, University of Tennessee) Gustavo Marqués (Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires) Julie A. Nelson (USA, University of Massachusetts, Boston) Paul Ormerod (UK, Volterra Consulting) Richard Parker (USA, Harvard University) Ann Pettifor (UK, Policy Research in Macroeconomics) Alicia Puyana (Mexico, Latin American School of Social Sciences) Jacques Sapir (France, École des hautes études en sciences socials) Peter Söderbaum (Sweden, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology) Peter Radford (USA, The Radford Free Press) David Ruccio (USA, Notre Dame University) Immanuel Wallerstein (USA, Yale University)
Revere Award in Economics
Dynamite Prize for Economics
Blog Authors
- anmayhew
- Asad Zaman
- Lewis L. Smith
- bruceedmonds
- Kevin P. Gallagher
- deanbaker1
- Steve Keen
- Deniz Kellecioglu
- David F. Ruccio
- donaldgillies
- Peter Dorman
- Editor
- frankackerman
- frankrotering
- Edward Fullbrook
- iettogg
- jamieamorgan
- Jim Stanford
- julieanelson
- Lars Syll
- Maria Alejandra Madi
- Mark Weisbrot
- merijntknibbe
- njhaering
- paul davidson
- Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra
- Peter Earl
- pesod
- peterradford
- paul ormerod
- Peter Earl
- staveren
“capital appreciation plus reinvested dividends” compare to wages
Really this is so crazy…
Crazy indeed, but not surprising, as finance capital is always the winner.
The term “capitalist” referring to an owner of capital, appears earlier than the term “capitalism,” dating, to the mid-17th century. “Capitalism” is derived from capital, which was developed from capitale, a late Latin word based on caput, meaning “head”—also the origin of “chattel” and “cattle” in the sense of movable property (only much later to refer only to livestock). Capitale was created in the 12th to 13th centuries referring to funds, stock of merchandise, sum of money or money carrying interest. By 1283, it was used in the sense of the capital assets of a trading firm and it was frequently interchanged with a number of other words—wealth, money, funds, goods, assets, property and so on.
The first usage of the term “capitalism” in its modern sense is attributed to Louis Blanc in 1850 (“What I call ‘capitalism’ that is to say the appropriation of capital by some to the exclusion of others”) and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon in 1861 (“Economic and social regime in which capital, the source of income, does not generally belong to those who make it work through their labour”). Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels referred to the “capitalistic system” and to the “capitalist mode of production” in Capital (1867). According to the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), the term “capitalism” first appeared in English in 1854 in the novel The Newcomes by novelist William Makepeace Thackeray, where he meant “having ownership of capital”. Also, according to the OED, Carl Adolph Douai, a German American socialist and abolitionist, used the phrase “private capitalism” in 1863.
Thus created, how could capitalism do anything else but denigrate non-capitalists and treat them as subhuman. Put in more subtle language and mostly cleaned of its malice, that belief still exists today. In an unguarded moment George H.W. Bush uttered this, “I can see no purpose for those who are not investors, not capitalists.” In other words, workers, even skilled ones have no place in the world of capitalists, except as they can serve capitalists. Treating workers as expendable tools of capitalism is thus part of the history of capitalism.
Braudel, Fernand. The Wheels of Commerce: Civilization and Capitalism 15th–18th Century, Vol. 2, Harper and Row, 1979.
James Augustus Henry Murray. “Capitalism” p. 94.