The Autocatalytic Sprawl of Pseudorational Mastery (version 0.12)

The Autocatalytic Sprawl of Pseudorational Mastery (version 0.12)
Martin, Ulf. (2018). Working Papers on Capital as Power. No. 2018/04. June. pp. 1-20. (Article - Working Paper; English).

Warning

There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.

Full Text Available As:
[thumbnail of 20180600_martin_the_autocatalytic_sprawl_of_psudorational_mastery_v012_front.jpg]
Preview
Cover Image
20180600_martin_the_autocatalytic_sprawl_of_psudorational_mastery_v012_front.jpg

Download (8kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Full Text]
Preview
PDF (Full Text)
20180600_martin_the_autocatalytic_sprawl_of_psudorational_mastery_v012.pdf

Download (324kB) | Preview

Alternative Locations

http://www.capitalaspower.com/2018/06/2018-04-martin-the-autocatalytic-sprawl-of-pseudorational-mastery-version-0-12/, https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/179917

Abstract or Brief Description

According to Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan capital is not an economic quantity but a mode of power; it could be sumarized as: “Capital is power quantified in monetary terms”. So, what do we do when we “quantify”? What is the nature of “money” in a capitalist society? And, indeed, what is “power” in the first place?

In the following I will try to develop a concept of power as the ability of persons to create particular formations. The kind of formations persons can think of depends on the society a person lives in, which can be identified by what Cornelius Castoriadis called its social imaginary significations (SIS). The core SIS of capitalism is rational mastery operating with computational rationality. Computational rationality in turn rest on a particular understanding of how signification works: operational symbolism, as theories by Sybille Krämer (following Leibniz). When the concept of the SIS of modern rationality was developed in the 1950s and 60s, bureaucracy was seen as its main organisational mode or rational mastery. I will argue that capitalisation and bureaucratisation are the two modes of rational mastery which interact with each other. The paper concludes with deliberations on the future of rational mastery and the possibility of “ways out”.

Language

English

Publication Type

Article - Working Paper

Keywords

bureaucratization capitalization money power rationality signification symbolism

Subject

BN Methodology
BN Philosophy
BN Power
BN Revolution
BN State & Government
BN Capital & Accumulation
BN Civilization & Social Systems
BN Culture
BN Institutions

Depositing User

Jonathan Nitzan

Date Deposited

29 Jun 2018 19:50

Last Modified

20 Jul 2018 23:34

URL:

https://bnarchives.net/id/eprint/544

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item