Technological Change and Strategic Sabotage: A Capital as Power Analysis of the US Semiconductor Business

Technological Change and Strategic Sabotage: A Capital as Power Analysis of the US Semiconductor Business
Mouré, Christopher. (2023). Real-World Economics Review. No. 103. March. pp. 26-55. (Article - Journal; English).

Full Text Available As:

Preview	Cover Image 20230331_moure_technological_change_and_strategic_sabotage_front.jpg Download (37kB) | Preview
Preview	PDF (Full Text) 20230331_moure_technological_change_and_strategic_sabotage.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview

Alternative Locations

http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue103/Moure, https://capitalaspower.com/2023/04/moure-technological-change-and-strategic-sabotage-a-capital-as-power-analysis-of-the-us-semiconductor-business/, https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/270855, https://yorkspace.library.yorku.ca/items/dbc3127d-d91e-4f90-80cc-c0392813d471

Abstract or Brief Description

Rapid technological change is often touted as a fundamental reality of capitalist societies. It is also presented as concrete evidence for the supposed progressive improvement of material well-being that characterises the capitalist system of social order. Since its emergence in the mid-20th century, semiconductor technology in many ways exemplifies this view. Yet the rapid advancement of semiconductor technology has also been accompanied by social conflict. The history of the technology is as much a story of frequent global chip ‘shortages’ and geopolitical disputes as it is one of exponentially growing computational power. The purpose of this study is to examine how the two sides of this story—progress and conflict—are linked. Starting from the theoretical political economic framework of capital as power, I put organized social power at the centre of this inquiry. I examine the behaviour of large semiconductor manufacturing firms in an attempt to uncover empirical relationships between capital investment, chip ‘shortages’, prices, and profits. Using quantitative and qualitative analysis, I find evidence that dominant semiconductor firms have engaged in systematic underinvestment in order to control chip prices for differential gain.

Language

English

Publication Type

Article - Journal

Keywords

capital as power computers differential accumulation inflation power profit semiconductors technology sabotage scarcity stagflation

Subject

BN International & Global
BN Power
BN Science & Technology
BN Value & Price
BN Business Enterprise
BN Capital & Accumulation
BN Distribution
BN Growth
BN Industrial Organization

Depositing User

Jonathan Nitzan

Date Deposited

08 Apr 2023 01:16

Last Modified

29 Nov 2023 18:07

URL:

https://bnarchives.net/id/eprint/777

Actions (login required)

View Item