The Capital As Power Approach. An Invited-then-Rejected Interview with Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan

The Capital As Power Approach. An Invited-then-Rejected Interview with Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan
Bichler, Shimshon and Nitzan, Jonathan. (2023). Review of Capital as Power. Vol. 2. No. 2. September. pp. 96-174. (Article - Journal; English).

Full Text Available As:

Preview	Cover Image 20230900_bn_the_casp_approach_invited_and_rejcted_recasp_front.JPG Download (65kB) | Preview
Preview	PDF (Full Text) 20230900_bn_the_casp_approach_invited_and_rejcted_recasp.pdf Download (513kB) | Preview
	HTML (Full Text) 20230900_bn_the_casp_approach_invited_and_rejcted_recasp.html Download (322kB)
	Other (Excel data for the figures) 20230900_bn_the_casp_approach_invited_and_rejcted_recasp.xlsx Download (18kB)
Preview	Other (Figure 1 -- JPEG) fig_01.JPG Download (223kB) | Preview
Preview	Other (Figure 2 -- JPEG) fig_02.JPG Download (400kB) | Preview

Alternative Locations

https://capitalaspower.com/2023/09/bichler-nitzan-the-capital-as-power-approach-an-invited-then-rejected-interview/, https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/279831, https://yorkspace.library.yorku.ca/items/0374aca8-0014-4693-b0ee-60478b84cb9c

Abstract or Brief Description

PREFACE. This interview was commissioned in October 2019 for a special issue on ‘Accumulation and Politics: Approaches and Concepts’ to be published by the Revue de la régulation. We submitted the text in March 2020, only to learn two months later that it won’t be published.

The problem, we were informed, wasn’t the content, which everyone agreed was ‘highly interesting and stimulating’. It was the format. To begin with, the text was suddenly deemed ‘too long’. Although the length was agreed on beforehand, the special-issue editors — or maybe it was their bosses on the Editorial Board — now insisted that we cut it by no less than two-thirds. They also instructed us to make our answers more ‘interview-like’ and ‘personal’. Finally, and perhaps most tellingly, they demanded that we change our ‘tone’, which they found ‘unfair’ and ‘one-sided’. Translation: we should take a hike.

This encounter with two-minded editors wasn’t our first. In another Review of Capital as Power paper, titled ‘Manuscripts Don’t Burn’, we sketch our history with Jekyll & Hyde editors who often used ‘length’ and ‘tone’ to reject articles they had invited but couldn’t stomach.

But first, the original interview, in full.

Language

English

Publication Type

Article - Journal

Keywords

capital as power liberalism Marxism neoclassical economics political economy

Subject

BN International & Global
BN Labour
BN Macro
BN Micro
BN Methodology
BN Money & Finance
BN Power
BN Production
BN Region - North America
BN Region - Middle East
BN Resistance
BN Agency
BN State & Government
BN Value & Price
BN War & Peace
BN Business Enterprise
BN Capital & Accumulation
BN Civilization & Social Systems
BN Class
BN Conflict & Violence
BN Crisis
BN Distribution
BN Growth
BN Industrial Organization
BN Institutions

Depositing User

Jonathan Nitzan

Date Deposited

13 Sep 2023 01:16

Last Modified

22 Nov 2023 17:55

URL:

https://bnarchives.net/id/eprint/799

Available Versions of this Item

• The Capital As Power Approach. An Invited-then-Rejected Interview with Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan. (deposited 02 Jun 2020 17:15)
  • The Capital As Power Approach. An Invited-then-Rejected Interview with Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan. (deposited 13 Sep 2023 01:16) [Currently Displayed]

Actions (login required)

View Item